Pakistan has warned it will retaliate when India takes military action against this after a militant attack on Native indian forces in Indian-administered Kashmir.
Prime Ressortchef (umgangssprachlich) Imran Khan went on television in order to call on India to provide data to support its claims that Pakistan was involved.
India responded that Mister Khan was again making excuses.
Additional than 40 members of India's safety measures forces died in Thursday's suicide bombing on their convoy.
Pakistan-based militant party Jaish-e-Mohammad said it was behind this.
The attack has raised tensions among India and Pakistan, which have struggled two wars and a limited turmoil in the region and are each nuclear powers.
What did Khan state?
In his first comments addressing typically the attack, he said India should "stop blaming Pakistan without any proof or perhaps evidence" and urged Indian authorities to be able to share any "actionable intelligence".
"If an individual think that you will launch any kind of kind of attack on Pakistan, Pakistan will not just think about retaliation, Pakistan will retaliate, " he mentioned, adding that only dialogue could aid solve issues in Kashmir.
Why Indian and Pakistan dispute Kashmir
Pulwama assault: What are Modi's options?
India offers long accused Pakistan of backing partisan separatists in Indian-administered Kashmir.
Mr Khan, who took office last year, mentioned his government was ready to co-operate with India in investigating the episode. But he also said Delhi will need to reflect on why Kashmiri youth acquired reached a point where they simply no longer feared death.
The prime ressortchef (umgangssprachlich) said he had not addressed the particular attack earlier because of Saudi Overhead Prince Mohammed bin Salman's high-profile pay a visit to to Pakistan on Sunday and Tuesday.
How did India respond?
In some sort of statement, the foreign ministry said of which Mr Khan had failed to condemn the "heinous act" nor offer condolences to victims' families.
"It is a new well-known fact that Jaish-e-Mohammad and the leader Masood Azhar are based within Pakistan. [This] should become sufficient proof for Pakistan to have action, " the ministry said.
This said that past attacks in Asia attributed to Pakistan-based militants had not necessarily been investigated properly by Islamabad.
Mister Khan had also mentioned India's forthcoming elections in the context of phone calls for retaliation against Pakistan - expressing politicians believed strong action would raise votes.
The Indian foreign ministry mentioned the insinuation was "regrettable", adding: "India's democracy is a model for the particular world which Pakistan would never know. "
Earlier, India's top military leader in Kashmir, Lt Gen KJS Dhillon, accused Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) see agency of "controlling" the attack by using Jaish-e-Mohammad commanders, but he provided not any evidence.
The funerals driving youth to be able to militancy
Viewpoint: How far might Asia go to 'punish' Pakistan?
"I'd get all the mothers in Kashmir in order to please request their sons who possess joined terrorism to surrender and receive back to the mainstream, " he / she said. "Otherwise anyone who has harvested up the gun will be slain. "
The suicide bomber has already been identified as a young man through the region. Correspondents say a substantial number of young Kashmiris have registered militant groups in recent years.
Not comfortable questions for Khan
By BBC Pakistan correspondent, Secunder Kermani, in Islamabad
If Imran Khan took office last season he said he wanted to enhance relations with India, and that with regard to every one step India took, Pakistan would take two.
The traditional information in Pakistan is that the nation's army hasn't wanted closer ties in between the ì•ˆì „ 놀ì´í„° two. However, as the government seems supportive of Imran Khan's management it had been hoped progress may now be made. In fact, above the past few months, Indian representatives have been the ones more hesitant to pursue negotiations - probably for the reason that of the upcoming elections.
In his or her speech, Imran Khan said there seemed to be "a new mindset" in Pakistan, in addition to that any militant group using Pakistaner soil was an "enemy" of the particular country. He asked the Indian administration what gain they thought Pakistan may hope to achieve from an harm like this.
But while his self-confident and measured speech will go along well domestically, uncomfortable questions remain concerning the state's relationship with Kashmir-focused partisan groups like Jaish-e-Mohammad. While JeM is definitely a banned organisation, many international experts believe Pakistani intelligence services allow this operate under the radar.
How great are tensions?
Both India and Pakistan claim all of Muslim-majority Kashmir, although control only parts of it.
Thursday's bombing was the deadliest attack about Indian forces in the region regarding decades.
So far India has targeted on retaliation by economic and diplomatic means. It has revoked Pakistan's Just about all Favoured Nation trading status and brought up customs duties to 200%.
Both nations have recalled top diplomats.
How in addition might India retaliate?
Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who is facing an selection later this year, has vowed the strong response and says he will certainly give the military free rein.
Typically the last time an attack on American indian forces close to this magnitude happened in Kashmir was in 2016, once 19 soldiers were killed at a new base. In response to that, Of india carried out "surgical strikes" which engaged Indian soldiers crossing the de facto border to hit Pakistani posts.
This specific time heavy snow in the area could make that kind of constrained ground response impossible, analysts say. Although there are fears that going even more - with air strikes, for instance - could lead to Pakistani retaliation and a significant escalation.